IntermediateTECHNICAL
Walk me through your approach to assessing immigration eligibility and risks for a new assignment or transfer (e.g., short-term business trip vs. long-term work assignment). Which data points, tools, and legal/HR inputs do you use, and how do you document and communicate your recommendations?
Global Mobility / Immigration Specialist
General

Sample Answer

When I get a new request, I start with a structured intake: nationality, current location, host country, role description, activities, compensation, and expected duration. For example, for a recent 6‑month project in France, I first mapped the proposed activities against business visitor rules using our immigration vendor’s portal and the corporate policy matrix. I check red flags like prior visa denials, previous stays, and any permanent establishment or social security implications with tax and HR. For higher‑risk cases, I’ll get a short written opinion from local counsel and attach it to the file. I document everything in our case management system (we used PeopleSoft plus a SharePoint dossier): facts, options (e.g., short-stay visa vs. work permit), processing times, and my recommendation with a clear risk rating. Then I walk the manager and HRBP through it in plain language and confirm decisions in writing. This approach cut last‑minute immigration escalations by about 30% over a year.

Keywords

Structured intake process capturing nationality, activities, duration, and compensationUse of vendor portals, policy matrices, and local counsel for risk assessmentFormal documentation with options, risk rating, and written recommendationClear, plain-language communication to managers and HR to reduce escalations