Loading page...
An AI assistant built specifically for interview preparation. It generates questions for your target role, conducts live voice practice sessions, and scores your answers across five dimensions — available free, 24/7, with a free account and no credit card.
Most people prepare for interviews by reading sample answers. This builds knowledge but not skill. You know what a good answer looks like; you can't deliver one under pressure. The gap between knowing and doing is exactly what practice closes — and practice requires feedback.
An AI interview helper fills three gaps in solo preparation. First, it generates questions you wouldn't ask yourself. People naturally practice the questions they're comfortable with and avoid the ones they're not — which means they stay weakest at the questions most likely to trip them up. Second, it provides structured feedback instead of vague self-assessment. "That felt okay" is how you evaluate yourself. "Your answer scored 4/5 on relevance but 2/5 on depth — you mentioned the outcome but not the specific metrics" is how the helper evaluates you. Third, it creates time pressure that mimics real interviews. In a real interview, you don't get to pause, think for two minutes, then restart. The AI keeps the conversation moving.
The sequence that produces the best results: start with the helper's question generation to discover what you'll be asked. Practice each question 2-3 times with voice interaction. Review your dimensional scores. Then do a full mock session (5-7 questions) to simulate the real experience. Total time: 30-45 minutes per session, 3-5 sessions before your interview.
Each answer you give during practice receives a score from 1 to 5 on five dimensions. This mirrors how trained interviewers evaluate candidates using structured scoring rubrics — except you get the scores immediately instead of never.
Did your answer address the actual question? A common failure: giving a well-structured answer to a different question than the one asked.
Was it organized logically? STAR, problem-solution, chronological — the method matters less than having one.
Did you include specific details? Numbers, metrics, timelines, and concrete examples instead of vague generalities.
Was it concise? Could a listener follow your reasoning without getting lost in tangents or repetition?
Was your delivery assertive? Hedging language ("I kind of" "maybe" "I think") versus definitive statements that demonstrate conviction.
Free, private, and available right now. No credit card, no downloads.
Start Practicing